CloudCompare forum

The interpolation can only be done inside the cloud "convex hull". Outside of the convex hull, it's not possible to interpolate values. Therefore we use the "Fill with" value specified below the option for these cells. See http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Rast...

Hi, Indeed, the Chi2 distance is the one used in the Chi2 test. The exact way to choose the right number of classes is a bit tricky (see https://github.com/CloudCompare/CloudCompare/blob/master/CC/src/StatisticalTestingTools.cpp#L54 ). And for the significance level... I really don't know! Clearly, ...

I bet the tool you are looking for is 'Display > Render to file': http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/in ... er_to_File

You can even increase the resolution (a lot) this way.

Hi Everyone,

Done! qCANUPO is now open-source! A big thank to Dimitri ;)

It is now part of the official CC repository:
https://github.com/CloudCompare/CloudCo ... re/qCanupo

Hum, hard to give you precise directions as each problem needs specific processings and steps (no 'out of the box' tool here ;). Look for curvature and roughness computation tools (see http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Methods ). Maybe it's possible to automatically detect nests w...

Well, the shortage of memory is just a guess from CloudCompare (it may be another error, because the work is done by GDAL and not CC).

Can you maybe share the cloud with me so that I can try to reproduce the error on my side?

Best

Daniel

Ah, ah, if I could get 1$ each time this question is asked ;)

Just select an entity (or several) and most of the tools / menus should be enabled (depending on the number and the type of entities selected).

Sorry, I read your email to fast, and I thought you only wanted the ground... Not sure that CSF will help you if you want to keep the buildings. Then maybe you could try to 'classify' and remove the vegetation. In this case, you should take a look at the Canupo plugin. Otherwise, not sure how you ca...

Well, in some cases, you are right, 4 accurate surveying points are better than any other solution. To be more precise, it' particularly true if the scan is very good and made by an undistorted laser scanner for instance. And of course this scan needs also to be dense enough so that you can accurate...

You should definitely take a look at the qCSF plugin: http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/in ... F_(plugin)

There are other ways to achieve similar results (you can find interesting posts on the forum about this topic), but this plugin is particularly efficient!